HomeMy WebLinkAbout279An
ORDINANCE N0, 279
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE
ENACTING AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
65858 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE RELATING TO A MORATORIUM ON ]HE
USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and
determine that:
1) That certain property located northerly
of Cypress Street; westerly of Fraijo, easterly of
the railroad; and southerly of Huston Street, is
presently designated on the General Plan as
"Residential", but is zoned M-2.
2) That such inconsistency and the proper
land use for such property is presently under
study by the Planning Commission.
SECTION 2. The Council further finds that the
processing of such studies is contemplated within the
next few months, and that to permit further development
of such property prior to the consummation of the
appropriate hearings thereon would in large measure
emasculate the benefits to be derived therefrom and would
be contrary to the best interests and general welfare of
the residents of this city.
SECTION 3. Pending completion of such studies, and
pursuant to the provisions of Section 65858 of the
Government Code, a moratorium is hereby imposed upon the
development of such property (as described above) and the
City shall issue no building or grading permit in
connection therewith.
SECTION 4. All provisions
Code inconsistent herewith are
this Ordinance.
of the Irwindale Municipal
suspended during the term of
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall expire upon the latest
date authorized by Section 65858 of the California Government
Code.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become immediately
effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 65858 of the
Government Code and for the reasons above stated, and is
adopted pursuant to the authority of Anderson V. Pleasant Hills,
229 CA 2d 79; Metro Realty v. County of E1 Dorado, 222 CA 2d 508;
Hunter v. Adams, 180 CA 2d 511; 44 AG Ops 14; and Slater v.
Los Angeles, 238 CA 2d 864; West Coast Adv. v. San Francisco,
256 CA 2d 357; and Candlestick v. San Francisco Bav Conservatinn
Development Commission, 11 CA 3d 557;
County of Sacramento, 40 CA 3d 809 .
ie
Ordinance No. 279
465
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this ordinance and shall oause the same to be processed in
the manner prescribed by law.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of October, 1974.
a/.a.-' rte'
Mayor of the City of
Irwindale, California
ATTEST:
Marg et.S. Barbosa, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss:
CITY OF IRWINDALE )
Iy Margaret S. Barbosa,.City Clerk of the City of
Irwindale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance,
being Ordinance No. 279, was introduced as an urgency.
ordinance at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Irwindale, held on the 10th day of October, 1974,
and was duly passed, approved and adopted by said Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City
Clerk by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Barbosa, Chico, Pat Miranda and
Mayor Michael Miranda.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: Breceda
Marga t S. Barbosa, City Clerk