HomeMy WebLinkAbout300. --.. -_ --_ .... -.....
.o
ORDINANCE NO. 300
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE
ENACTING AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
65858 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
RELATING TO A MORATORIUM ON THE USE OR
DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and
determine that:
1) That certain property located northerly of Cypress
Street; westerly of Fraijo, easterly of the railroad and
southerly of Huston Street, is presently designated on
the General Plan as "Residential", but is zoned M-2.
2) That such inconsistency and the proper land use for
such property is presently under study by the Planning
C ommis s ion .
SECTION 2. The Council further finds that the processing
of such studies is contemplated within the next few months and
that to permit further development of such property prior to
the consummation of the appropriate hearings thereon would in
large measure emasculate the benefits to be derived therefrom and
would be contrary to the best interests and general welfare of
the residents of this city
SECTION 3. Pending completion of such studies, and pursuant
to the provisions of Section 65858 of the Government Code, a
moratorium is hereby imposed upon the development of such property
(as described above) and the City shall issue no building or
grading permit in connection therewith.
SECTION 4. All provisions of the Irwindale Municipal Code
inconsistent herewith are suspended during the term of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall expire upon the, latest date
authorized by Section 65858 of the California Government Code.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become immediately effective
pursuant to the provisions of Section 65858 of the Government Code
and for the reasons above stated, and is adopted pursuant to the
authority of Anderson V. Pleasant Hills, 229 CA 2d 79; Metro
Realty V. County of E1 Dorado 222 CA 2d 508; Hunter v. Adams,
180 CA 2d 864; West Coast Adv. v. San Francisco, 256 CA 2d 3571-
and
57'and Candlestick v San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development
Commission, 11 CA 3d 557; and Atlantic Richfield v. County of
Sacramento. 40 CA 3d 809.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this ordinance and shall cause the same to be processed in the
manner prescribed by law.
Ordinance No. 300
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1976.
Pat S. Miran a, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marga t S. Barbosa, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss:
CITY OF IRWINDALE )
I, Margaret S. Barbosa, City Clerk of the City of
Irwindale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance,
being Ordinance No. 300, was introduced as an urgency ordinance
at a regular adjotrned meeting of the City Council of the City
of Irwindale, held on the 15th day of April, 1976, and was
duly passed, approved and adopted by said Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk by the
following vote of the Council:
AYES:: COUNCILMEN.: Barbosa, Breceda, Michael Miranda,
Tapia and Mayor Pat Miranda.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: ; COUNCILMEN: None
MargS. Barbosa, City Clerk