HomeMy WebLinkAbout304M
that:
ORDINANCE NO. 304
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE
ENACTING AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
65858 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
RELATING TO A`MORATORIUM ON THE USE OR
DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine
1) That certain property located northerly of Cypress
Street; westerly of Fraijo, easterly of the railroad
and southerly of Huston Street, is presently
designated on the General Plan as "Residential", but
is zoned M-2.
2) That such inconsistency and the proper land use for
such property is presently under study by the Planning
Commission.
SECTION 2. The Council further finds that the processing of
such studies is contemplated within the next few months and that to
permit further development of such property prior to the consummation
of the appropriate hearings thereon would in large measure emasculate
the benefits to be derived therefrom and would be contrary to the
best interests and general welfare of the residents of this city.
SECTION 3. Pending completion of such studies, and pursuant
to the provisions of Section 65858 of the Government Code, a
moratorium is hereby imposed upon the development of such property
(as decribed above) and the city shall issue no building or grading
permit in connection therewith.
SECTION 4. All provisions of the Irwindale Municipal Code
inconsistent herewith are suspended during the term of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall expire upon the latest date
authorized by Section 65858 of the California Government Code.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become immediately effective
pursuant to the provisions of Section 65858 of the Government Code
and for the reasons above stated, and is adopted pursuant to the
authority of Anderson V. Pleasant Hills, 229 CA 2d 79; Metro Realty
V. County of E1 Dorado 222 CA 2d 508; Hunter v. Adams, 180 CA 2d 864;
West Coast Adv. v. San Francisco, 256 CA 2d 357; and Candlestick u.
San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, 11 CA 3d
557; and Atlantic Richfield v. County of Sacramento, 40 CA 3d 809.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this ordinance and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner
prescribed by law.
479
Ordinance No. 304
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1976.
Pat S.Mir da, Mayor
ATTEST:/Ma�r et �B%, 2Citv 0
k
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF IRWINDALE)
I, Margaret S. Barbosa, City Clerk of the City of Irwindale,
do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance, being Ordinance
No. 304, was introduced as an urgency ordinance at a regular
adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Irwindale,
held on the 16th day of September, 1976, and was duly passed,
approved and adopted by said Council, approved and signed by the
Mayor and attested by the City Clerk by the following vote of the
Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Barbosa, Breceda, Michael Miranda,
Tapia and Mayor Pat Miranda.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
Marg et S. Barbosa, City Clerk